Quantum Cloud Services
P3Tier 3 · RoutineVendor NDA · NDA_QuantumCloud_v3.pdf · submitted 1 hour ago
Vendor Review · Junior pool · P3
What the engine read
Vendor NDA — routine SaaS procurement, low sensitivity
How material it is
- Counterparty0.18
- Regulatory0.10
- Strategic0.08
- Data / Privacy0.06
- M&A0.05
Severity Tier 3 sets priority and SLA. Routing is decided by the Counterparty dimension (0.18) — the same severity with a different hot dimension routes to a different specialist. The vector routes, not the scalar.
This case sits 3 points above the 95% calibrated auto-route threshold — so it auto-cleared to its destination without human review.
Gate compares routing-decision confidence against system calibration (when the engine says 95%, observed accuracy must hold at 95%) — the SR 11-7 number.
Why this routing — policy basis
“Inbound agreements are routed by materiality tier. Tier 3 (routine) auto-routes to the junior pool; Tier 2 and Tier 1 require senior specialist review unless the routing-decision confidence clears the calibrated auto-route threshold.”
Tier 3 (routine) + routing-decision confidence 0.98 ≥ 0.95 auto-route threshold → junior pool, no escalation.
Proposed resolution — suggested redlines
- §4 — Liability cap
Add a mutual liability cap at twelve (12) months' fees
BankCo's standard vendor NDA includes a mutual cap; the submitted draft omits it. Flagged for the junior pool to add at execution.
- just nowTong · Senior Counsel, Vendor & CommercialCase opened for review
- 1 hr agoIntake systemDocument received from Sam Ortiz (Procurement)
- 1 hr agoExtraction engine v3.18 signals extracted, mean confidence 0.9797%
- 1 hr agoMateriality engine v1.4Risk vector + severity computed: 0.16 (Tier 3)
- 1 hr agoRouting engine v1.4Destination: Junior pool. Auto-route gate: 0.98 ≥ 0.95 → AUTO-ROUTED98%
Always here. Every claim on the left traces back to one of these.